179 S.E.2d 906 (S.C. 1971), 19184, White v. State

Citation: 179 S.E.2d 906, 255 S.C. 493

Opinion Judge: BUSSEY, Justice.

Party Name: Roosevelt WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of South Carolina et al., Respondents.

Attorney: Messrs. Melton Kligman and G. Raymond McElveen, Jr., for Appellant, cite: As to the Court's below erring in failing to find that the Appellant was not represented by counsel at the time of pleading and arraignment in the full meaning of the attorney and client relationship: 372 U.S. 335; 287 U.S....

Case Date: Monday March 08, 1971

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

179 S.E.2d 906 (S.C. 1971), 19184, White v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 158 S.E.2d 647 (S.C. 1967), 18741, Ross v. State
South Carolina - 168 S.E.2d 770 (S.C. 1969), 18937, Dixon v. State
South Carolina - 175 S.E.2d 796 (S.C. 1970), 19081, Sanders v. Leeke
South Carolina - 179 S.E.2d 720 (S.C. 1971), 19185, Gilbert v. Duke Power Co.