178 Cal.App.2d 15, 3051, In re Tinsley

Citation: 178 Cal.App.2d 15, 2 Cal.Rptr. 642

Opinion Judge: [10] Van Dyke

Party Name: In re Tinsley

Attorney: [7] Elmer R. Tinsley, in pro. per., for Petitioner. [8] Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier and Lloyd Hinkelman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

Case Date: Monday February 15, 1960

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

178 Cal.App.2d 15, 3051, In re Tinsley

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 44 Cal.2d 241, 5643, In re Bartges
California - 123 Cal.App.2d 395, 2941, In re Mcmanus
California - 152 Cal.App.2d 594, 3378, In re Rye