177 Cal.App.3d 831, A024880, County of Santa Cruz v. City of Watsonville

Citation: 177 Cal.App.3d 831, 223 Cal.Rptr. 272

Opinion Judge: [11] Agliano

Party Name: County of Santa Cruz v. City of Watsonville

Attorney: [7] Donald R. Haile, City Attorney, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Weiser, Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, Herbert M. Weiser, Goldfarb & Lipman, Lee C. Rosenthal, McDonough, Holland & Allen, T. Brent Hawkins, Joseph E. Coomes, Jr., Straddling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth and Thomas P. Clark as Amici Curi...

Case Date: August 23, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

177 Cal.App.3d 831, A024880, County of Santa Cruz v. City of Watsonville

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 119 Cal. 624, L. A. 273, Murphy v. City of San Luis Obispo
California - 166 Cal. 140, S. F. 6194, Bancroft-Whitney Company (A Corporation) v. McHugh
California - 61 Cal.2d 21, 26751, In re Bunker Hill Urban Renewal Project 1B of CommunityRedevelopment Agency of City of Los Angeles
California - 13 Cal.3d 721, 30369, County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court
California - 14 Cal.3d 768, 23209, City of Fairfield v. Superior Court

See all quotations