177 Cal.App.3d 792, E001693, Searcy v. Hemet Unified School Dist.

Citation: 177 Cal.App.3d 792, 223 Cal.Rptr. 206

Opinion Judge: [10] Kaufman

Party Name: Searcy v. Hemet Unified School Dist.

Attorney: [7] David Prescott for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Marvin Goldsmith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey T. Miller, Deputy Attorney General, Sylvester & Oppenheim and Richard D. Oppenheim, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday February 20, 1986

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

177 Cal.App.3d 792, E001693, Searcy v. Hemet Unified School Dist.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 182 Cal. 29, L. A. 5239, Art Metal Construction Company v. A. F. Anderson Company
California - 13 Cal.3d 297, 30294, Warden v. City of Los Angeles
California - 17 Cal.3d 425, 23042, Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California
California - 2 Cal.3d 741, 29737, Dailey v. Los Angeles Unified Sch. Dist.
California - 22 Cal.3d 508, 30857, Hoyem v. Manhattan Beach City Sch. Dist.

See all quotations