177 Cal.App.3d 293, B007714, Curtis v. Board of Retirement

Citation: 177 Cal.App.3d 293, 223 Cal.Rptr. 123

Opinion Judge: [10] Baffa

Party Name: Curtis v. Board of Retirement

Attorney: [7] Lemaire, Faunce & Katznelson and Mark Ellis Singer for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] De Witt W. Clinton, County Counsel, and Marshall Rose, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: January 14, 1986

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

177 Cal.App.3d 293, B007714, Curtis v. Board of Retirement

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 64 Cal.2d 441, 7693, Gorman v. Cranston
California - 107 Cal.App.2d 155, 14982, Sweeney v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California - 33 Cal.App.3d 394, 40812, McGriff v. County of Los Angeles
California - 36 Cal.App.3d 815, 1741, Neeley v. Board of Retirement
California - 59 Cal.App.3d 293, 14828, Mobil Oil Corp. v. Superior Court

See all quotations