176 Cal.App.3d 454, 24371, Miller v. California Com. On Status of Women

Citation: 176 Cal.App.3d 454, 222 Cal.Rptr. 225

Opinion Judge: [10] Sparks

Party Name: Miller v. California Com. On Status of Women

Attorney: [7] Thomas M. Burton and Burton, Brunt & Robbins for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Andrea Sheridan Ordin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, M. Anne Jennings and Marian M. Johnston, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: December 12, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

176 Cal.App.3d 454, 24371, Miller v. California Com. On Status of Women

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 684 F.2d 1375 (11th Cir. 1982), 81-7017, Doe v. Busbee
Federal Cases - 639 F.2d 1090 (4th Cir. 1981), 79-1765, Bunting v. City of Columbia
Federal Cases - 446 U.S. 754 (1980), 79-912, Hanrahan v. Hampton
Federal Cases - 455 U.S. 445 (1982), 80-5887, White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment Security
California - 17 Cal.3d 206, 30567, Stanson v. Mott

See all quotations