176 Cal.App.2d 509, 5998, Climo v. Lamp

Citation: 176 Cal.App.2d 509, 1 Cal.Rptr. 468

Opinion Judge: [10] Monroe

Party Name: Climo v. Lamp

Attorney: [7] Rutan, Lindsay, Dahl, Smedegaard, Howell & Tucker and W. W. McCray for Appellants. [8] Moss, Lyon & Dunn, Fulton W. Haight and Henry F. Walker for Respondents.

Case Date: Monday December 21, 1959

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

176 Cal.App.2d 509, 5998, Climo v. Lamp

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 109 Cal.App.2d 286, 18564, Shivers v. Van Loben Sels
California - 111 Cal.App.2d 807, 18855, Beseau v. George
California - 138 Cal.App.2d 634, 21018, Owens v. White Memorial Hospital
California - 143 Cal.App.2d 509, 5176, Mcguire v. San Diego Transit System
California - 159 Cal.App.2d 615, 22874, Durkee v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.