175 Cal.App.3d 962, D002052, Paulino v. Civil Service Com.

Citation: 175 Cal.App.3d 962, 221 Cal.Rptr. 90

Opinion Judge: [10] Kremer

Party Name: Paulino v. Civil Service Com.

Attorney: [7] James M. Gattey and Stephen W. Parrish for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr., County Counsel, and Enrique L. Munoz, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent and Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Case Date: December 18, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

175 Cal.App.3d 962, D002052, Paulino v. Civil Service Com.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 51 Cal.2d 84, 25097, Macfarlane v. Dept. Alcoholic Bev. Control
California - 15 Cal.3d 194, 23241, Skelly v. State Personnel Bd.
California - 18 Cal.3d 395, 23457, Barber v. State Personnel Bd.
California - 240 Cal.App.2d 659, 22608, Brown v. Gordon
California - 145 Cal.App.3d 395, AO21059, Ackerman v. State Personnel Bd.

See all quotations