175 Cal.App.2d 40, 9620, Beckwith v. County of Stanislaus

Citation: 175 Cal.App.2d 40, 345 P.2d 363

Opinion Judge: [11] Schottky

Party Name: Beckwith v. County of Stanislaus

Attorney: [7] Frederick W. Reyland, Jr., County Counsel, David G. Dunford, Assistant County Counsel, Clayton M. Ham, Deputy County Counsel, and Jeremy C. Cook, for Appellants. [8] Robert D. Carter for Respondent. [9] Johnson & Stanton, Gardiner Johnson, Thomas Stanton, Jr., and Marshall A. Stanton, as Amic...

Case Date: Friday October 30, 1959

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

175 Cal.App.2d 40, 9620, Beckwith v. County of Stanislaus

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 159 Cal. 749, Sac. 1801, City of Madera v. Madera Canal and Irrigation Company
California - 191 Cal. 172, S. F. 10486, In re Controversy Between the City and County of San Francisco
California - 15 Cal.2d 542, 16406, The City of Oakland v. Williams
California - 17 Cal.2d 707, 16293, Los Angeles v. Superior Court
California - 105 Cal.App.2d 821, 4329, Copeland v. County of Kern