174 Cal.App.3d 208, AO24548, Clarke v. Hoek

Citation: 174 Cal.App.3d 208, 219 Cal.Rptr. 845

Opinion Judge: [11] Scott

Party Name: Clarke v. Hoek

Attorney: [7] Scott D. Righthand and Bostwick & Tehin for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Stuart M. Gordon, Nancy E. Hudgins, Thomas A. Packer, Bradford W. Lomas and Gordon & Rees for Defendant and Respondent. [9] James E. Ludlam, Musick, Peeler & Garrett, David E. Willett, Catherine I. Hanson and Hassard, Bo...

Case Date: Friday November 08, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

174 Cal.App.3d 208, AO24548, Clarke v. Hoek

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 219 Cal. 384, S. F. 14891, Perry v. D. J. & T. Sullivan, Inc.,
California - 62 Cal.2d 154, 21771, Quintal v. Laurel Grove Hospital
California - 69 Cal.2d 108, 22583, Rowland v. Christian
California - 1 Cal.3d 586, 29620, U.S. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.
California - 15 Cal.3d 40, 30452, Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.

See all quotations