174 A. 189 (Conn. 1934), Stoto v. City of Waterbury

Citation: 174 A. 189, 119 Conn. 14

Opinion Judge: MALTBIE, Chief Justice.

Party Name: STOTO v. CITY OF WATERBURY.

Attorney: James E. McKnight, of Waterbury, for appellant. Vincent A. Scully and Charles S. O'Connor, both of Waterbury, for appellee.

Judge Panel: HINMAN and ANVERY, JJ., dissenting. Argued before MALTBIE, C.J., and HAINES, HINMAN, BANKS, and AVERY, JJ. In this opinion, HAINES and BANKS, JJ., concurred. HINMAN, Judge (dissenting). In this opinion, AVERY, J., concurred.

Case Date: Friday July 27, 1934

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

174 A. 189 (Conn. 1934), Stoto v. City of Waterbury

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 64 U.S. 209 (1860), Philadelphia, W. & B. R. Co. v. Philadelphia & Havre De Grace Steam Towboat Co.
Connecticut - 118 A. 517 (Conn. 1922), Flynn v. Town of West Hartford
Connecticut - 155 A. 493 (Conn. 1931), Trasacco v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co.
Connecticut - 155 A. 499 (Conn. 1931), Hoffman v. City of Bristol
Connecticut - 157 A. 860 (Conn. 1932), Bogoratt v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Co.

See all quotations