173 S.E.2d 266 (Ga.App. 1970), 44956, Hargett v. State

Citation: 173 S.E.2d 266, 121 Ga.App. 157

Party Name: Durwood C. HARGETT v. The STATE.

Attorney: (b) The representations or transactions admissible under (a) above may have occurred subsequent to the event for which the defendant was prosecuted as well as prior to the event., Garland & Garland, Edward T. M. Garland, Reuben A. Garland, Atlanta, for appellant., Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., To...

Case Date: Monday February 09, 1970

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

173 S.E.2d 266 (Ga.App. 1970), 44956, Hargett v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 149 S.E. 46 (Ga. 1929), 7216, Merritt v. State
Georgia - 46 S.E. 897 (Ga. 1904), Cawthon v. State
Georgia - 150 S.E.2d 819 (Ga. 1966), 23692, Salisbury v. State
Georgia - 156 S.E.2d 177 (Ga.App. 1967), 42654, Sloan v. State
Georgia - 164 S.E.2d 861 (Ga.App. 1968), 43888, Maddox v. State

See all quotations