172 S.E.2d 827 (S.C. 1970), 19021, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Smith

Citation: 172 S.E.2d 827, 253 S.C. 639

Opinion Judge: LOUIS ROSEN, Acting Associate Justice.

Party Name: SOUTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, Appellant, v. Charlotte M. SMITH, Respondent.

Attorney: Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, and C. Pinckney Roberts, Assistant Attorney General, of Columbia, and William M. Wilson, of Camden, for Appellant, cite: As to the damages not being properly assessed as prejudical testimony was admitted and considered: 45 S.C.L. (11 Rich. L.) 239; 46 S...

Case Date: March 03, 1970

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

172 S.E.2d 827 (S.C. 1970), 19021, South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Smith

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Michigan - 293 N.W. 755 (Mich. 1940), 107, In re Gratiot Ave., City of Detroit
North Carolina - 113 S.E.2d 263 (N.C. 1960), 101, Williams v. State Highway Commission
South Carolina - 157 S.E. 842 (S.C. 1931), 13095, Chick Springs Water Co., Inc. v. State Highway Dept.
New York - 256 N.Y. 236, In re Allen Street and First Ave. Borough of Manhattan City of New York
South Carolina - 118 S.E.2d 809 (S.C. 1961), 17754, Riley v. South Carolina State Highway Dept.

See all quotations