172 N.E.2d 3 (Ohio 1961), 36550, King Drug Co. of Dayton v. Bowers

Citation: 172 N.E.2d 3, 171 Ohio St. 461

Opinion Judge: Per Curiam.

Party Name: KING DRUG CO. OF DAYTON, D.B.A. King Drugs, et al., Appellants, v. BOWERS, Tax Com'r, Appellee.

Attorney: Weinberger & Grad, Cincinnati, for appellants., Mark McElroy, Atty. Gen., and John J. Dilenschneider, Columbus, for appellee. Messrs. Weinberger & Grad, for appellants. Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, and Mr. John J. Dilenschneider, for appellee.

Judge Panel: WEYGANDT, C. J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur. O'NEILL, Judge (dissenting).

Case Date: Wednesday February 01, 1961

Court: Ohio Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

172 N.E.2d 3 (Ohio 1961), 36550, King Drug Co. of Dayton v. Bowers

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Ohio - 64 N.E. 574 (Ohio 1902), Slingluff v. Weaver
Ohio - 158 N.E.2d 193 (Ohio 1959), 35870, Bronowicz v. Bowers
Ohio - 166 N.E.2d 139 (Ohio 1960), 36124, S. S. Kresge Co. v. Bowers
Ohio - 172 N.E.2d 17 (Ohio 1961), 36711, Bailey v. Alvis
Ohio - 56 N.E.2d 265 (Ohio 1944), 29779, State ex rel. Foster v. Evatt

See all quotations