172 Cal.App.3d 966, G000315, Pham v. Wagner Litho MacHinery Co.

Citation: 172 Cal.App.3d 966, 218 Cal.Rptr. 476

Opinion Judge: [10] Trotter

Party Name: Pham v. Wagner Litho MacHinery Co.

Attorney: [7] Greene, O'Reilly, Agnew & Broillet, Browne, Greene, Horvitz & Levy, Ellis J. Horvitz and S. Thomas Todd for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Morgan, Wenzel & McNicholas and Richard J. Murphy for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: September 30, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

172 Cal.App.3d 966, G000315, Pham v. Wagner Litho MacHinery Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 187 Cal. 95, S. F. 9795, Andersen v. Superior Court
California - 17 Cal.2d 280, 16357, Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal
California - 28 Cal.2d 61, 17225, Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior Court
California - 33 Cal.2d 908, 19610, City of Pasadena v. City of Alhambra
California - 38 Cal.2d 114, 21556, Rose v. Knapp

See all quotations