171 Cal.App.3d 775, A016105, Friedman v. Stadum

Citation: 171 Cal.App.3d 775, 217 Cal.Rptr. 585

Opinion Judge: [10] Poche

Party Name: Friedman v. Stadum

Attorney: [7] Friedman, Collard, Poswall & Thompson, Wade R. Thompson, Roger A Dreyer and R. Parker White for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] Edward M. Stadum, in pro. per., Shiver & Stadum, Michael E. Hartmann and Richard G. Katerndahl for Defendant and Respondent.

Case Date: Wednesday August 28, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

171 Cal.App.3d 775, A016105, Friedman v. Stadum

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 18 Cal.2d 146, 16539, Jaffe v. Stone
California - 44 Cal.2d 90, 23083, Temescal Water Co. v. Dept. Public Works
California - 13 Cal.3d 43, 30156, Bertero v. National General Corp.
California - 3 Cal.3d 841, 22761, Babb v. Superior Court
California - 7 Cal.3d 94, 22831, Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.

See all quotations