171 Cal.App.2d 761, 23494, Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 171 Cal.App.2d 761, 341 P.2d 410

Opinion Judge: [10] Vallee

Party Name: Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, and William E. Still and Weldon L. Weber, Deputy City Attorneys, for Appellant. [8] Leo Shapiro for Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday July 07, 1959

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

171 Cal.App.2d 761, 23494, Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 204 Cal. 387, L. A. 9435, Ritchey v. Watson
California - 29 Cal.2d 661, 19746, Eastlick v. City of Los Angeles
California - 32 Cal.2d 598, 19962, Nichols v. Mitchell
California - 41 Cal.2d 419, 18772, Peters v. City & County of San Francisco
California - 41 Cal.2d 70, 22543, Barrett v. City of Claremont

See all quotations