170 So. 309 (Fla. 1936), State Ex Rel. Titus v. Peacock

Citation: 170 So. 309, 125 Fla. 810

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: STATE ex rel. TITUS v. PEACOCK, County Judge, et al.

Attorney: [125 Fla. 810]Horace D. Riegle, of Daytona Beach, for relator. Scarlett & Futch, of De Land, and Horn & Ossinsky, of Daytona Beach, for respondents.

Case Date: Tuesday October 27, 1936

Court: Florida Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

170 So. 309 (Fla. 1936), State Ex Rel. Titus v. Peacock

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

North Carolina - 104 S.E. 346 (N.C. 1920), 259, Jenkins v. State Board of Elections of North Carolina
Missouri - 187 S.W. 1159 (Mo. 1916), Straughan v. Meyers
Florida - 143 So. 754 (Fla. 1932), State v. Tucker
Florida - 170 So. 118 (Fla. 1936), State Ex Rel. Gandy v. Page
Florida - 170 So. 127 (Fla. 1936), Bannerman v. State

See all quotations