170 Cal.App.3d 481, B007127, Mendez v. Kurten

Citation: 170 Cal.App.3d 481, 215 Cal.Rptr. 924

Opinion Judge: [10] Arguelles

Party Name: Mendez v. Kurten

Attorney: [7] Demler & Armstrong, Robert W. Armstrong and Robert B. Ryder for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Gage & Mazursky and Sanford M. Gage for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: July 23, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

170 Cal.App.3d 481, B007127, Mendez v. Kurten

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 32 Cal.2d 204, 20486, Lineman v. Schmid
California - 51 Cal.2d 640, 24742, Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal.
California - 17 Cal.3d 575, 23431, California Housing Finance Agency v. Elliott
California - 226 Cal.App.2d 246, 10813, Channell v. Superior Court of Sacramento County
California - 121 Cal.App.3d 11, 49094, Kizziah v. Department of Transportation

See all quotations