170 Cal.App.2d 399, 23490, Dunitz v. City of Los Angeles

Citation: 170 Cal.App.2d 399, 338 P.2d 1001

Opinion Judge: [10] Nourse

Party Name: Dunitz v. City of Los Angeles

Attorney: [7] Dunlap, Holmes, Ross & Woodson for Appellants. [8] Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, and Marcus E. Crahan, Jr., Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

Case Date: Monday May 18, 1959

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

170 Cal.App.2d 399, 23490, Dunitz v. City of Los Angeles

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 20 Cal.2d 640, 16188, Moss v. Moss
California - 28 Cal.2d 790, 17006, California Physicians' Service v. Garrison
California - 34 Cal.2d 442, 17747, Hannula v. Hacienda Homes
California - 152 Cal.App.2d 319, 22164, Armistead v. City of Los Angeles
California - 48 Cal.App.2d 746, 13321, Monahan v. Department of Water & Power

See all quotations