17 S.E.2d 239 (Ga.App. 1941), 29151, Hoppendietzel v. Wade

Citation: 17 S.E.2d 239, 66 Ga.App. 132

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: HOPPENDIETZEL v. WADE et al.

Attorney: Hewlett & Dennis and Albert E. Mayer, all of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error. McElreath, Scott, Duckworth & Riley, Neely, Marshall & Greene, and W. O. Wilson, all of Atlanta, for defendant in error.

Judge Panel: STEPHENS, P. J., and FELTON, J., concur. SUTTON, J., dissents. SUTTON, Judge (dissenting).

Case Date: November 07, 1941

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

17 S.E.2d 239 (Ga.App. 1941), 29151, Hoppendietzel v. Wade

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 49 Ga. 207 (Ga. 1873), Reid v. Humber
Georgia - 45 S.E. 977 (Ga. 1903), Kimbrough v. Boswell
Georgia - 53 S.E. 244 (Ga. 1906), Southern Ry. Co. v. Grizzle
Georgia - 17 S.E.2d 243 (Ga.App. 1941), 29158, Brewer v. Commercial Credit Co.
Georgia - 7 S.E.2d 917 (Ga.App. 1940), 28040, Risby v. Sharp-Boylston Co.