17 N.W. 406 (Wis. 1883), Davis v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company

Citation: 17 N.W. 406, 58 Wis. 646

Opinion Judge: TAYLOR, J.

Party Name: DAVIS v. THE CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Attorney: For the appellant there was a brief by Wm. H. Rogers and I. W. & G. W. Bird, and oral argument by Mr. G. W. Bird. Wm. F. Vilas, for the respondent, to the point that as the plaintiff was at most a licensee, the company owed to him no specific duty of watchfulness and care,

Case Date: Tuesday November 20, 1883

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court