17 N.W. 322 (Wis. 1883), Hoile v. Bailey

Citation: 17 N.W. 322, 58 Wis. 434

Opinion Judge: CASSODAY, J.

Party Name: HOILE v. BAILEY, imp. HOILE v. MCCULLOCH, imp

Attorney: For the appellants there were briefs by Raymond & Haseltine, as attorneys, and Winfield Smith, of counsel, on behalf of Bailey, and by Winfield Smith, on behalf of McCulloch; and the cause was argued orally by Mr. Smith. G. W. Cate, for the respondent, contended, inter alia, that McCulloch was li...

Case Date: November 20, 1883

Court: Wisconsin Supreme Court