17 Cal.App.3d 958, 36330, Carmichael v. Reitz

Citation: 17 Cal.App.3d 958, 95 Cal.Rptr. 381

Opinion Judge: [10] Aiso

Party Name: Carmichael v. Reitz

Attorney: [7] Harney, Ford & Schlottman and David M. Harney for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Bonne, Jones & Bridges, H. Gilbert Jones, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Dryden, Harrington & Swartz and Winchester Cooley III for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday May 27, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

17 Cal.App.3d 958, 36330, Carmichael v. Reitz

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 416 F.2d 417 (2nd Cir. 1969), 578, Basko v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
Federal Cases - 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1968), 20995, Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.
Federal Cases - 235 F.2d 893 (10th Cir. 1956), 5249, Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corp.
California - 218 Cal. 69, L. A. 13223, Hart v. Farris
California - 24 Cal.2d 81, 18736, Lawless v. Calaway

See all quotations