169 S.E.2d 387 (S.C. 1969), 18954, Rochester v. Holiday Magic, Inc.

Citation: 169 S.E.2d 387, 253 S.C. 147

Opinion Judge: LITTLEJOHN, Justice.

Party Name: James R. ROCHESTER, Respondent, v. HOLIDAY MAGIC, INC., Appellant.

Attorney: O. G. Calhoun, Esq., of Haynsworth, Perry, Bryant, Marion & Johnstone, of Greenville, for Appellant, cites: As to action of Appellants counsel not constituting notice of appearance and demand for complaint: 178 S.C. 351, 183 S.E. 145; 102 S.C. 333, 86 S.E. 683; 87 F.Supp. 211; 36 F.Supp. 671. As ...

Case Date: Wednesday August 20, 1969

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

169 S.E.2d 387 (S.C. 1969), 18954, Rochester v. Holiday Magic, Inc.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 11 S.E.2d 436 (S.C. 1940), 15165, Gaskins v. California Ins. Co.
South Carolina - 11 S.E.2d 438 (S.C. 1940), 15160, Boyle Road & Bridge Co. v. American Employers' Ins. Co. of Boston, Mass.
South Carolina - 111 S.E.2d 205 (S.C. 1959), 17583, Holliday v. Holliday
South Carolina - 160 S.E.2d 133 (S.C. 1968), 18772, Brown v. Weathers
South Carolina - 99 S.E.2d 391 (S.C. 1957), 17330, Simon v. Flowers