169 S.E. 149 (N.C. 1933), 334, Roach v. City of Durham

Citation: 169 S.E. 149, 204 N.C. 587

Opinion Judge: ADAMS, Justice.

Party Name: ROACH v. CITY OF DURHAM et al.

Attorney: Brawley & Gantt, of Durham, for plaintiff. S. C. Chambers, of Durham, for City of Durham. McLendon & Hedrick, of Durham, for State Board of Examiners.

Case Date: April 26, 1933

Court: North Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

169 S.E. 149 (N.C. 1933), 334, Roach v. City of Durham

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Illinois - 80 N.E. 341 (Ill. 1907), Douglas v. People
North Carolina - 78 N.C. 119 (N.C. 1878), Gatlin v. Town of Tarboro
North Carolina - 89 N.C. 291 (N.C. 1883), Worth v. Wilmington & W.R. Co.
North Carolina - 91 N.C. 554 (N.C. 1884), State v. Bean
North Carolina - 109 S.E. 65 (N.C. 1921), 322, State v. Vanhook

See all quotations