168 Cal.App.3d 970, B010193, Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court

Citation: 168 Cal.App.3d 970, 215 Cal.Rptr. 36

Opinion Judge: [10] Roth

Party Name: Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court

Attorney: [6] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Edmond B. Mamer and Diane M. Spencer, Deputy Attorneys General, for Petitioner. [7] No appearance for Respondent. [8] Overland, Berke, Wesley, Gits, Randolph & Levanas, Mark E. Overland, Stanley L. Dorn and Carl Burkow for Real Parties in Interest.

Case Date: May 31, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

168 Cal.App.3d 970, B010193, Franchise Tax Board v. Superior Court

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 260 Cal.App.2d 819, 32036, Schaeffer v. Municipal Court, Santa Barbara-Goleta Judicial Dist., Santa Barbara County
California - 266 Cal.App.2d 556, 33597, Derry v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California - 151 Cal.App.3d 777, A019010, Pacific Intermountain Express v. National Union Fire Ins. Co.
California - 83 Cal.App.3d 582, 53345, Cooke v. Superior Court
California - 92 Cal.App.3d 90, 4522, Wilder v. Superior Court