168 Cal.App.3d 898, AO25674, Santiago v. Employee Benefits Services

Citation: 168 Cal.App.3d 898, 214 Cal.Rptr. 679

Opinion Judge: [10] Merrill

Party Name: Santiago v. Employee Benefits Services

Attorney: [7] M. P. Dailey, Mark Tanner and Dailey & Hyman for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Clark W. Patten, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Mark G. Bonino, Lawrence M. Guslani and Ropers, Majeski, Kohn, Bentley & Wagner for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: May 30, 1985

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

168 Cal.App.3d 898, AO25674, Santiago v. Employee Benefits Services

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 23 Cal.3d 815, 23925, Gallamore v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.
California - 23 Cal.3d 880, 23843, Royal Globe Ins. Co. v. Superior Court
California - 7 Cal.3d 616, 29954, Unruh v. Truck Insurance Exchange
California - 172 Cal.App.2d 731, 18264, Noe v. Travelers Ins. Co.
California - 115 Cal.App.3d 15, 57410, Everfield v. State Comp. Ins. Fund

See all quotations