168 Cal.App.2d 206, 18049, Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties

Citation: 168 Cal.App.2d 206, 335 P.2d 769

Opinion Judge: [10] Draper

Party Name: Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties

Attorney: [7] William H. Neblett, R. Arthur Bellman, Leighton M. Bledsoe and Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart, Johnson & Phelps for Appellants. [8] Bernard Allard, Fernhoff & Wolfe, Leon G. Seyranian and Richard G. Logan for Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday February 26, 1959

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

168 Cal.App.2d 206, 18049, Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 90 Cal. 346, 12958, Gorham v. Heiman
California - 18 Cal.2d 33, 16558, Imperial Ice Co. v. Rossier
California - 29 Cal.2d 34, 17196, Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters
California - 106 Cal.App. 238, Civ. 219, Worthington v. Peoples State Bank of Chula Vista (a Corp.)
California - 30 Cal.App. 52, Civ. 1628, Jenkins v. Locke-Paddon Company

See all quotations

168 Cal.App.2d 206, 18049, Holland v. Morgan &amp; Peacock Properties

168 Cal.App.2d 206, 18049, Holland v. Morgan & Peacock Properties