167 Cal.App.2d 453, 17887, Dropo v. City & County of S. F.

Citation: 167 Cal.App.2d 453, 334 P.2d 972

Opinion Judge: [10] Bray

Party Name: Dropo v. City & County of S. F.

Attorney: [7] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Donald J. Kropp, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants. [8] Appel, Liebermann & Leonard and Vladimir Vucinich for Respondents.

Case Date: Friday January 30, 1959

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

167 Cal.App.2d 453, 17887, Dropo v. City & County of S. F.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 187 Cal. 302, L. A. 6563, Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Company
California - 13 Cal.2d 248, 16923, Arellano v. City of Burbank
California - 16 Cal.2d 285, 17471, Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.
California - 20 Cal.2d 366, 18150, Pipoly v. Benson
California - 21 Cal.2d 399, 17829, Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service Commrs.

See all quotations

167 Cal.App.2d 453, 17887, Dropo v. City &amp; County of S. F.

167 Cal.App.2d 453, 17887, Dropo v. City & County of S. F.