166 S.E.2d 604 (Ga.App. 1969), 43973, State Highway Dept. v. Cantrell

Citation: 166 S.E.2d 604, 119 Ga.App. 241

Party Name: STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. Fred CANTRELL et al.

Attorney: (b) The court did not err in denying the motion for mistrial, based upon condemnees' counsel's improper argument to the jury in the de novo trial, revealing the amount of the assessors' award, in view of the instructions to the jury which have been held to remove the alleged harm., Arthur K. Bolt...

Case Date: February 27, 1969

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

166 S.E.2d 604 (Ga.App. 1969), 43973, State Highway Dept. v. Cantrell

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 182 S.E. 384 (Ga. 1935), 10765, Georgia Power Co. v. Puckett
Georgia - 43 S.E. 533 (Ga. 1903), Patton v. State
Georgia - 64 S.E. 1073 (Ga. 1909), Atlanta, B. & A.R. Co. v. Smith
Georgia - 71 S.E. 903 (Ga. 1911), Gate City Terminal Co. v. Thrower
Georgia - 131 S.E.2d 527 (Ga. 1963), 21961, Tift County v. Smith

See all quotations