164 S.E.2d 917 (Ga.App. 1968), 43982, Lamar Nash Buick-pontiac, Inc. v. Crowe

Citation: 164 S.E.2d 917, 118 Ga.App. 669

Opinion Judge: QUILLIAN, Judge.

Party Name: LAMAR NASH BUICK-PONTIAC, INC. v. Bert E. CROWE.

Attorney: damage to an automobile was sufficient evidence as to its value., The plaintiff filed an action against Lamar Nash Buick-Pontiac, Inc., defendant in the lower court, for property damage to his automobile. The petition alleged in part that: the defendant had custody and control of an automobile be...

Judge Panel: BELL, P.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Case Date: November 19, 1968

Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

164 S.E.2d 917 (Ga.App. 1968), 43982, Lamar Nash Buick-pontiac, Inc. v. Crowe

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 125 S.E.2d 511 (Ga.App. 1962), 39381, Kroger Co. v. Perpall
Georgia - 162 S.E.2d 9 (Ga. 1968), 24559, Mccurry v. Bailey
Georgia - 164 S.E.2d 919 (Ga.App. 1968), 43981, Lamar Nash Buick Pontiac, Inc v. Tullis
Georgia - 57 S.E.2d 77 (Ga. 1950), 16878, Pantone v. Pantone
Georgia - 88 S.E.2d 809 (Ga.App. 1955), 35462, Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Clements