162 S.W.2d 973 (Tex.Crim.App. 1942), 22095, Conklin v. State

Citation: 162 S.W.2d 973, 144 Tex.Crim. 343

Opinion Judge: DAVIDSON, Judge. PER CURIAM. PER CURIAM.

Party Name: CONKLIN v. STATE.

Attorney: [144 Tex.Crim. 344] H. J. Bernard and Kenneth Aynesworth, both of Houston, for appellant. Dan W. Jackson, Crim. Dist. Atty., Thomas M. Ryan, and O'Brien Stevens, Asst. Crim. Dist. Attys., all of Houston, and Spurgeon E. Bell, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

Case Date: May 20, 1942

Court: Texas Court of Criminal Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

162 S.W.2d 973 (Tex.Crim.App. 1942), 22095, Conklin v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Texas - 216 S.W. 1086 (Tex.Crim.App. 1919), 5556, Kennedy v. State
Texas - 268 S.W. 161 (Tex.Crim.App. 1925), 8457, Stanford v. State
Texas - 299 S.W. 899 (Tex.Crim.App. 1927), 10882, Beles v. State
Texas - 157 S.W.2d 648 (Tex.Crim.App. 1942), 21776, Monroe v. State
Texas - 59 S.W.2d 406 (Tex.Crim.App. 1933), 15549, Archey v. State

See all quotations