161 Cal.App.3d 79, G000395, Dunston v. State of California

Citation: 161 Cal.App.3d 79, 207 Cal.Rptr. 196

Opinion Judge: [10] Wallin

Party Name: Dunston v. State of California

Attorney: [7] Laurence E. Clark for Plaintiff and Appellant. [8] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Marvin Goldsmith, Assistant Attorney General, Jeffrey T. Miller and Kristin G. Hogue, Deputy Attorneys General, Beam, DiCaro, D'Antony & Stafford, Mark M. Gnesin, Ruston & Nance and Lee P. O'Connor for D...

Case Date: Thursday September 27, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

161 Cal.App.3d 79, G000395, Dunston v. State of California

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 66 Cal.2d 24, 7771, Viles v. State
California - 66 Cal.2d 468, 29026, Tammen v. San Diego County
California - 217 Cal.App.2d 77, 20884, Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State
California - 270 Cal.App.2d 598, 24850, Shaddox v. Melcher
California - 104 Cal.App.3d 25, 5316, City of Fresno v. Superior Court

See all quotations