160 Cal.App.3d 1011, B003559, Creighton v. City of Santa Monica

Citation: 160 Cal.App.3d 1011, 207 Cal.Rptr. 78

Opinion Judge: [11] Compton

Party Name: Creighton v. City of Santa Monica

Attorney: [7] Robert M. Myers, City Attorney, Stephen S. Stark, Assistant City Attorney, Karl M. Manheim and Martin T. Tachiki, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Michael Heumann, Stephen P. Wiman, Marsha Jones Moutrie, Joel Martin Levy and Barbara O'Hearn for Real Party in Interest ...

Case Date: Friday October 12, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

160 Cal.App.3d 1011, B003559, Creighton v. City of Santa Monica

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 33 Cal.2d 453, 20383, Lockard v. City of Los Angeles
California - 40 Cal.2d 572, 18675, Hanley v. Murphy
California - 44 Cal.2d 284, 6353, City of Petaluma v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.
California - 46 Cal.2d 644, 19026, Lundberg v. County of Alameda
California - 50 Cal.2d 182, 6894, County of Placer v. Aetna Cas. Etc. Co.

See all quotations