16 S.C. 143 (S.C. 1881), CASE 1103, Gray v. Walker

Citation: 16 S.C. 143

Opinion Judge: SIMPSON, C. J.

Party Name: GRAY v. WALKER.

Attorney: Messrs. Duncan & Cleveland , for appellant, Messrs. Wofford & Jennings , contra, Let it be admitted, however, that Hughes had authority, and could rightfully act for defendant in furnishing labor in such way that his consent would bind the defendant. Did he consent?

Judge Panel: Before WALLACE, J., MCIVER and MCGOWAN, A. J.'s, concurred.

Case Date: Monday October 17, 1881

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court