16 S.E.2d 902 (Ga. 1941), 13773, City of Rome v. Rigdon

Citation: 16 S.E.2d 902, 192 Ga. 742

Opinion Judge: ATKINSON, Presiding Justice.

Party Name: CITY OF ROME v. RIGDON.

Attorney: (a) 'Demand' as here employed refers to the same thing as 'claim' in proviso number one., (b) 'Statute of limitations' contemplates the same as embodied in the Code,

Judge Panel: REID, Chief Justice (dissenting).

Case Date: Tuesday September 09, 1941

Court: Georgia Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

16 S.E.2d 902 (Ga. 1941), 13773, City of Rome v. Rigdon

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Georgia - 103 S.E. 464 (Ga. 1920), 1906, Spencer v. City of Columbus
Georgia - 107 S.E. 42 (Ga. 1921), 2262, Perkins v. Norristown School Dist. No. 42
Georgia - 143 S.E. 405 (Ga. 1928), 6133, Willcox v. Beechwood Band Mill Co.
Georgia - 190 S.E. 369 (Ga.App. 1937), 25904, City of Atlanta v. Truitt
Georgia - 25 S.E. 370 (Ga. 1896), Peterson v. Georgia R.R. & Banking Co.

See all quotations