16 Cal.App.3d 408, 12737, Betancourt v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd.

Citation: 16 Cal.App.3d 408, 94 Cal.Rptr. 9

Opinion Judge: [10] Pierce

Party Name: Betancourt v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd.

Attorney: [6] LeProhn & LeProhn, Eugene C. Treaster and Joseph S. Samuel for Petitioner. [7] Rupert Pedrin and Jon L. Gateley for Respondents. [8] Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold and Michael Laughlin for Real Party in Interest.

Case Date: March 30, 1971

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

16 Cal.App.3d 408, 12737, Betancourt v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 17 Cal.2d 628, 16508, Lockhart v. Wolden
California - 32 Cal.2d 351, 17709, Hollman v. Warren
California - 40 Cal.2d 317, 6377, Faulkner v. Cal. Toll Bridge Authority
California - 63 Cal.2d 551, 28273, Erlich v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County
California - 67 Cal.2d 496, 22547, Zeeb v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Bd.

See all quotations