158 S.E.2d 647 (S.C. 1967), 18741, Ross v. State

Citation: 158 S.E.2d 647, 250 S.C. 442

Opinion Judge: Moss, Chief Justice.

Party Name: Robert E. ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of South Carolina, and Ellis C. MacDougall, Director of Board ofCorrections, and their attorneys, Respondents.

Attorney: Clarence A. Chappell, Esq., of Greenville, for Appellant, cites: As to Appellant not being actually represented by counsel, at the time of pleading and arraignment, in the full meaning of the Attorney and Client relationship: 372 U.S. 335; 377 U.S. 201; 378 U.S. 479; (S. C.) 138 S.E.2d 840; 369 U...

Case Date: Wednesday December 27, 1967

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

158 S.E.2d 647 (S.C. 1967), 18741, Ross v. State

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 126 S.E.2d 843 (S.C. 1962), 17951, Crosby v. State
South Carolina - 133 S.E.2d 120 (S.C. 1963), 18118, Wyatt v. State
South Carolina - 145 S.E.2d 425 (S.C. 1965), 18420, Bailey v. MacDougall
South Carolina - 146 S.E.2d 257 (S.C. 1966), 18447, Dickson v. State
South Carolina - 98 S.E.2d 539 (S.C. 1957), 17296, Bank for Sav. and Trusts v. Towe