158 Cal.App.2d 419, 17756, Hughes v. City & County of San Francisco

Citation: 158 Cal.App.2d 419, 322 P.2d 623

Opinion Judge: [10] Kaufman

Party Name: Hughes v. City & County of San Francisco

Attorney: [7] Hoberg & Finger and Applebaum, Mitchell & Bennett for Appellant. [8] Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and C. Wesley Davis, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.

Case Date: Monday March 17, 1958

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

158 Cal.App.2d 419, 17756, Hughes v. City & County of San Francisco

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 212 Cal. 36, Sac. 4215, Rogers v. Interstate Transit Co.
California - 20 Cal.2d 585, 16529, Speck v. Sarver
California - 39 Cal.2d 388, 22274, Scott v. Burke
California - 4 Cal.2d 111, 15366, Paulsen v. Mcduffie
California - 8 Cal.2d 294, 16033, Mundy v. Marshall

See all quotations

158 Cal.App.2d 419, 17756, Hughes v. City &amp; County of San Francisco

158 Cal.App.2d 419, 17756, Hughes v. City & County of San Francisco