158 A. 886 (Conn. 1932), Richardson v. City of New Haven

Citation: 158 A. 886, 114 Conn. 389

Opinion Judge: HINMAN, J.

Party Name: RICHARDSON v. CITY OF NEW HAVEN et al.

Attorney: Harold K. Watrous and Daniel G. Campion, both of Hartford, for appellants. George E. Beers and William L. Beers, both of New Haven, for appellee.

Case Date: Tuesday February 23, 1932

Court: Connecticut Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

158 A. 886 (Conn. 1932), Richardson v. City of New Haven

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Connecticut - 131 A. 739 (Conn. 1926), Biederzycki v. Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.
Connecticut - 143 A. 155 (Conn. 1928), O'Brien v. Wise & Upson Co., Inc.
Connecticut - 147 A. 680 (Conn. 1929), Santini v. Levin
Connecticut - 157 A. 264 (Conn. 1931), Rousu v. Collins Co.
Connecticut - 97 A. 1020 (Conn. 1916), Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.