156 Cal.App.3d 989, AO15176, Corkland v. Boscoe

Citation: 156 Cal.App.3d 989, 203 Cal.Rptr. 356

Opinion Judge: [10] King

Party Name: Corkland v. Boscoe

Attorney: [7] Randall E. Kay, John A. Noda and New & Kay for Defendants and Appellants. [8] Roger L. Meredith, Jack K. Berman and David L. Cunningham for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Tuesday June 05, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

156 Cal.App.3d 989, AO15176, Corkland v. Boscoe

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 107 Cal.App.3d 876, 46232, Hastings v. Matlock
California - 116 Cal.App.3d 507, 5537, Ford v. State of California
California - 129 Cal.App.3d 796, 19828, Mancina v. Hoar
California - 130 Cal.App.3d 282, 49382, Nabi v. Laudermill
California - 143 Cal.App.3d 399, 54032, Degroat v. Ingles

See all quotations