156 Cal.App.3d 726, AO16317, Communications Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Citation: 156 Cal.App.3d 726, 203 Cal.Rptr. 779

Opinion Judge: [10] Rattigan

Party Name: Communications Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd.

Attorney: [7] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, and Patricia Streloff, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendant and Appellant. [8] Robert L. Dunn and Bancroft, Avery & McAlister for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Case Date: Thursday May 31, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

156 Cal.App.3d 726, AO16317, Communications Satellite Corp. v. Franchise Tax Bd.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 447 U.S. 207 (1980), 79-509, Exxon Corp. v. Department of Rev. of Wisconsin
Federal Cases - 437 U.S. 267 (1978), 77-454, Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair
California - 49 Cal.2d 729, 24146, Pac. Pipeline Const. Co. v. State Bd. Equal.
California - 51 Cal.2d 278, 6738, Mcneil v. Board of Retirement
California - 22 Cal.3d 208, 23849, Amador Valley Joint Union High Sch. Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization

See all quotations