156 Cal.App.3d 302, A021730, Stoneham v. Rushen

Citation: 156 Cal.App.3d 302, 203 Cal.Rptr. 20

Opinion Judge: [11] Racanelli

Party Name: Stoneham v. Rushen

Attorney: [7] John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Karl S. Mayer and Thomas P. Dove, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Appellant and Petitioner. [8] No appearance for Respondent Court. [9] Michael Satris, Donald Specter and Charles S. Bishop, Paul Comiskey and Smith, Snedeker & Comiskey for Pla...

Case Date: Thursday May 24, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

156 Cal.App.3d 302, A021730, Stoneham v. Rushen

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 720 F.2d 1132 (9th Cir. 1983), 82-4609, Hillery v. Rushen
California - 39 Cal.2d 561, 18224, Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. Contractors' Bd.
California - 40 Cal.2d 682, 22211, Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles
California - 58 Cal.2d 824, 7410, Pitts v. Perluss
California - 67 Cal.2d 733, 7817, Morris v. Williams

See all quotations