156 Cal.App.2d 161, 9169, Mclain v. Planning Commission

Citation: 156 Cal.App.2d 161, 319 P.2d 24

Opinion Judge: [10] Van Dyke

Party Name: Mclain v. Planning Commission

Attorney: [7] A. John Merlo for Appellants. [8] John A. Sutro, Richard B. Daugherty, Malcolm M. Barrett, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Price & Morony and Grayson Price for Respondents.

Case Date: Monday December 16, 1957

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

156 Cal.App.2d 161, 9169, Mclain v. Planning Commission

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 119 Cal. 376, L. A. 158, Santa Monica Lumber & Mill Co. v. Hege
California - 21 Cal.2d 790, 16609, Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners
California - 48 Cal.2d 15, 24364, Damiani v. Albert
California - 49 Cal.App. 281, Civ. 3354, Beck v. Wilson
California - 130 Cal.App.2d 356, 20368, Wood v. City Planning Commission

See all quotations