154 P.2d 53 (Okla. 1944), 31659, Hanes v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co.

Citation: 154 P.2d 53, 194 Okla. 657, 1944 OK 308

Opinion Judge: PER CURIAM.

Party Name: HANES v. MAGNOLIA PIPE LINE CO. et al.

Attorney: Claud Briggs, of Oklahoma City, and Homer H. Bishop, of Seminole, for petitioner. W.R. Wallace, of Oklahoma City, Wallace Hawkins, of Dallas, Tex., and Randell S. Cobb, Atty.Gen., for respondents.

Case Date: November 14, 1944

Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

154 P.2d 53 (Okla. 1944), 31659, Hanes v. Magnolia Pipe Line Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Oklahoma - 105 P.2d 218 (Okla. 1940), 29238, Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Voss
Oklahoma - 114 P.2d 173 (Okla. 1941), 30149, Armour & Co. v. Worden
Oklahoma - 40 P.2d 32 (Okla. 1934), 25379, McKeever Drilling Co. v. Egbert
Oklahoma - 56 P.2d 847 (Okla. 1936), 26452, Standard Roofing & Material Co. v. Mosley
Oklahoma - 83 P.2d 844 (Okla. 1938), 28602, Turner v. Ford

See all quotations