153 S.E.2d 912 (S.C. 1967), 18628, Bishop v. Tolbert

Citation: 153 S.E.2d 912, 249 S.C. 289

Opinion Judge: MOSS, Chief Justice.

Party Name: C. D. BISHOP and Enos O. Bishop, Appellants, v. Garland TOLBERT, Lee Alice T. Brockman and W. R. Timmons, Respondents.

Attorney: Messrs. Younts, Reese & Cofield, of Greenville, for Appellants, and George S. Townes, of Greenville, on Brief for Appellants, cite: As to time not being an essential part of the contract involved and purchasers did not forfeit their interests by failing to tender: 134 S.C. 54, 131 S.E. 319; 81 C....

Case Date: April 03, 1967

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

153 S.E.2d 912 (S.C. 1967), 18628, Bishop v. Tolbert

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

South Carolina - 3 S.C. 46 (S.C. 1871), Cureton v. Gilmore
South Carolina - 5 S.C. 450 (S.C.App.Law 1875), Lesesne v. Witte
South Carolina - 164 S.E. 613 (S.C. 1932), 13433, American Nat. Bank of Winter Haven, Fla., v. Caldwell
South Carolina - 190 S.E. 104 (S.C. 1937), 14438, Mitchum v. Mitchum
South Carolina - 85 S.E. 585 (S.C. 1915), 9064, Mobley v. Quattlebaum

See all quotations