153 S.E.2d 184 (S.C. 1967), 18608, Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co.

Citation: 153 S.E.2d 184, 249 S.C. 130

Opinion Judge: BUSSEY, Justice.

Party Name: Melvin E. SPRINGFIELD and Shirley C. Springfield, Respondents, v. WILLIAMS PLUMBING SUPPLY CO., Inc., Row Con Company and Meaders Co., Inc., ofwhich Williams Plumbing Supply Co., Inc., and Row Con Company are Appellants.

Attorney: Messrs. Haynsworth, Perry, Bryant, Marion & Johnstone, of Greenville, for Appellant, Row Con Company, and Messrs. Love, Thornton, Arnold & Thomason, of Greenville, for Appellant, Williams Plumbing Supply Co., Inc., cite: As to there being no basis in law or fact for holding that an electric hot w...

Case Date: February 20, 1967

Court: South Carolina Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

153 S.E.2d 184 (S.C. 1967), 18608, Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co.

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

New York - 217 N.Y. 382, MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
South Carolina - 140 S.E.2d 582 (S.C. 1965), 18305, Everett v. White
South Carolina - 145 S.E.2d 680 (S.C. 1965), 18440, Pleasant v. Mathias
South Carolina - 146 S.E.2d 875 (S.C. 1966), 18464, Salladin v. Tellis
South Carolina - 148 S.E.2d 154 (S.C. 1966), 18494, Sams v. Sams

See all quotations