152 Cal.App.3d 999, 22740, Rose v. County of Pulmas

Citation: 152 Cal.App.3d 999, 199 Cal.Rptr. 842

Opinion Judge: [10] Couzens

Party Name: Rose v. County of Pulmas

Attorney: [7] William J. Hooy and Ron Lane for Plaintiffs and Appellants. [8] Peters, Fuller, Rush, Schooling & Carter, David R. Fuller and James Farnsworth for Defendants and Respondents.

Case Date: Thursday March 08, 1984

Court: California Court of Appeals

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

152 Cal.App.3d 999, 22740, Rose v. County of Pulmas

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

California - 42 Cal.2d 675, 22980, Wilson v. Sharp
California - 32 Cal.3d 197, 31449, Davidson v. City of Westminster
California - 34 Cal.3d 18, 24343, Williams v. State of California
California - 9 Cal.3d 566, 30082, Gruenberg v. Aetna Ins. Co.
California - 271 Cal.App.2d 816, 9195, Harvey v. City of Holtville

See all quotations