152 A.2d 47 (N.J. 1959), A--115, Seipel v. Sevek

Citation: 152 A.2d 47, 29 N.J. 593

Opinion Judge: [9] Per Curiam

Party Name: Charles SEIPEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Charles SEVEK and Melba Silverman, Defendants-Respondents, and Roland K. Then, Herbert M. Then, Cirioco Scoppettuolo and Pontiac Construction Company, a corporation of New Jersey, Defendants.

Attorney: [6] Mr. Edward M. Gurry argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Rizzolo & Montalbano, attorneys).

Case Date: June 01, 1959

Court: New Jersey Supreme Court

Linked as:

Document options

Printable page
Email this

Extract

152 A.2d 47 (N.J. 1959), A--115, Seipel v. Sevek

No longer available (Autolink)

See the full content of this document

This document cites

Federal Cases - 222 F.2d 604 (1st Cir. 1955), 4866, Marshall v. Nugent
New Jersey - 108 A.2d 1 (N.J. 1954), A-7, Battaglia v. Norton
New Jersey - 146 A.2d 705 (N.J.Super.A.D. 1958), A--348, Seipel v. Sevek
New Jersey - 70 A.2d 764 (N.J. 1950), No. A--63, Hickman v. Dutch Treat Restaurant, Inc.
New Jersey - 86 A.2d 676 (N.J. 1952), A-66, Rapp v. Public Service Coordinated Transport